Eucalyptus trees were introduced to Madagascar from Australia when the
counties narrow gauge railways were built. Sadly, very little of the rail
network is still used, save from a freight line to the capital from an east
coast port, and a delightful passenger service, mainly used by tourists, pulled
by a railcar which (if memory serves) was acquired from Germany by France as
part of the reparations for World War I. The eucalyptus trees remain, and other
than various endemic pine trees, seem to be the main trees in most of the
terrain we’ve passed through. Eucalyptus grows quickly and responds fairly well
to crude coppicing (i.e., a tree may well regrow after most of it has been cut
down). That’s important in a country where the main fuels are wood and
charcoal. Nevertheless, over several hundred miles, I have yet to see a growing
tree as broad as many of the hewn stumps I have seen. Madagascar’s forests are
on a downward spiral that has been several decades in the making. And with a
rapidly growing population (around 50% young people), it’s hard to see that
turning around. Eco-tourism makes a significant contribution to the incentives
to conserve what remains.
We passed today through a region with greater tree cover. It was very
striking what a difference it made, not just visually, but to the wellbeing of
the people. Where more wood is available, there’s enough timber to support
tiled roofs, to construct attractive and useful balconies, and to make local
furniture. In all other respects, the terrain, the agriculture, everything,
very closely resembled all the other areas we had passed through. The better
state of the forests was the only apparent cause of significant differences in
wellbeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment